Page 1 of 6

916 福祸?Ahmad 灾害多大?

Posted: 04-09-08 Thu 11:10 pm
by 舜本
(1)916
(a)916真的会变天吗?
(b)难道,曾经卧薪尝胆十载的安华,会忽略欲速则不达的道理吗?
(c)人民(尤其minority组织与个人)应该如何成熟看待与处理变天?

(2)寄居论
(a)Ahmad的寄居论会带来多大的冲击与危害?
(b)他是否不觉成为了被政治高手操纵的棋子?
(c)华社不断攻击是成熟的做法吗?攻击在天时地利人和吗?
(d)华社咬着不放是成熟政治的做法吗?有了政治正确,就有了政治权利吗?
(云谲波诡,Ahmad有可能发生意外吗?会怎样?)

Posted: 05-09-08 Fri 10:21 am
by 云烟
虽然说916会变天还是一个未知数,但安华与其他在野党领袖已经是很有把握的样子。

所以我好奇,他们是怎样“出奇制胜”?

至于那位啊末先生所发表的寄居论,已经是闹得沸沸扬扬了。他在发表此言论的当儿副首相也在场,若是在当时就代他道歉的话,相信已经是息事宁人了,也不用搞到今天的这一个局面。

以我所知,到现在为止,啊末先生还是没有交代。308政治大海啸后国政政府已经是内忧外患一大堆了,现在又发表“寄居论”,更进一步让人制造机会,也许就是所谓的“当局者迷,旁观者清”吧!

Posted: 05-09-08 Fri 4:00 pm
by 舜本
評論:鄭丁賢‧千百個阿末2008-09-04 19:10


兩個星期前,我接到一個母親的電話。

她的女兒,在政府學校擔任教職,最近被安排接受一項訓練課程。

課堂上,一名講師公然否定非馬來人的公民地位,指他們是外來者;然後,指著華裔學員說:“這個國家是馬來人所擁有,你們不配要求甚麼。”

其它污辱和貶低的字眼,我不需要重覆。

這些華印裔學

生聽了,心裡忿忿不平,極為難過;但是,基於講師手上的權力,大家不敢當場反駁。

到了晚上,女兒終於按捺不住,打電話向母親哭訴經過。

從這位母親轉述女兒遭遇的聲音,聽得出她內心的激動和憤怒。然後,她掛了電話。

昨天,林吉祥公開另一位家長寫給他的信件。

他的女兒,獲得公共服務局獎學金,按照規定,需要出席一項課程。

講師來自首相署屬下的國家幹訓局(Biro Tata Negara)。這個機構的名聲和紀錄,大家心裡有數。

這位家長轉述,這名講師聲稱非馬來人不應該置疑馬來人的特權,而且要感謝馬來人給於公民地位,以及居留之所。

他還指示其他馬來人學員,不能和非馬來人交往。

非馬來學員受到的心理衝擊,可想而知。連一些馬來學員也受到驚嚇,哭了出來。

這兩起事件,過程竟是如此相同。我不知道,是不是涉及同一名講師?類似的事件,是否兩宗?

我相信,絕對不只是兩宗,而是以千百計。

各種政府課程,以及各級學校的課室內,都一再出現這類偏激的種族言論,歧視教育。

多少年輕的心靈受到戕害,多少啟蒙中的腦袋受到荼毒。

巫統為一個阿末依斯邁的言論,作出道歉。

千百個阿末依斯邁,還在我們的周圍,在族群之間,埋下分化和仇視的種子。

幾十年來的種族政治,單元教育,製造了無數的阿末、X講師,以及他們的信徒。

在國家被摧毀之前,請高抬貴手,不要再讓這種情況繼續下去。我們需要的是寬容諒解,不是仇恨和對抗。

(希望文中提起的母親,把詳細的經過、人物名字、主辦單位等資料電郵給我,以便轉給各有關機構,進行調查。我們不能只是哀嘆難過,而必須採取積極行動,作出改變了。)

星洲日報/夜雨晨風‧作者:鄭丁賢‧2008.09.04

Posted: 05-09-08 Fri 4:17 pm
by 舜本
我在KPLI时也面对同样的问题。
在课程里,非土著被批评。。到。。。。回‘祖国’去了。
当时,大家还是不敢去面对。
我曾起来反驳,之后,朋友说:好险。
而巫裔朋友说,真大胆!

现在,似乎改变了好多。
当安华胜选时,隔天一早到学校,我和巫裔同事,高兴到抱在一起。
还有,有一所学校,安华宣誓当天早上,
在办公室里,大家守在电视前等着看那一幕,
谁知,阿祥出现在镜头,说了几句,大家就拍手叫好。
虽然,大家叫好的不是安华与阿祥个人,而是欢呼健康的民主政治快点露面。

Posted: 05-09-08 Fri 6:32 pm
by 舜本
现在言论是多少开放了。
平等有望。

不过,
马华、民政等捉着Ahmad不放是好事吗?
本来就是应该对种族主义表达不满,但是现在是否是时候又喊又打呢?
一向静若寒蝉,现在突然爬到太岁头上动土;
阿祥哥要当副首相、英哥决定每年拨款给槟州华小一百万。

308时,巫裔朋友说:别怕,没事;
之后,KL、Penang示威时,他们说:别怕,没事;
现在他们说:如果我们感觉失去政权,我们会乱,this is political reality of malay!

Posted: 06-09-08 Sat 2:15 pm
by 舜本
投资与商家对 916 的期待。
有人说,再不变天,大马经济将退落或崩溃。
会这样吗?


Malaysian investors brace for Sept 16
Wong Choon Mei | Sep 6, 08 11:35am


Political stability has long been a plus factor underscoring much of the country's economic success through the decades, but even so, Malaysian investors - a hardened breed - are not saying 'No' to change if opposition icon Anwar Ibrahim does indeed manage the ' impossible' and forms a new government by his stated time-line of Sept 16.

Image

Experts interviewed by Malaysiakini said despite being unused to dramatic changes in the local political scene, investors should nevertheless have little difficulty accepting Anwar as prime minister and his Pakatan Rakyat alliance as replacement for the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition.

“Any change in government is bound to elicit some trepidation from the ground since the market will be dealing with uncertainties of how policies will be affected, I tend to take the view that most in the business sector would be pragmatic in aligning themselves with the powers that eventually be,” Tricia Yeoh, director of Centre of Public Policy Studies.

If the present administration maintains its current stand on economic policy, and if investors are not seeing the results of their capital now, they are not likely to see it in a year's time. If they are far-sighted, perhaps the lack of monetary fruition would provoke some desire for change - to end the already uncertain period sooner than later,” she added.

Sept 16 or Malaysia Day is the anniversary day of the formation of Malaysia in 1963, when eastern states Sabah and Sarawak formally became a part of the country.

The day has now taken on an additional meaning, becoming the rallying cry for Anwar's newly-minted alliance, as it pushes on with its bid to overthrow the Barisan from a long-entrenched position in parliament. Not only has Sept 16 become the nation's top talking point, it is also the time-line most closely watched by investors.

"Anwar used to be deputy prime minister and finance minister as well," said Dr PHS Lim, president of Malaysian Investors' Association. "So investors here know him from those days. He was also very popular with international investors when he was finance minister. There shouldn't be recognition problems with them either."

Anwar, who re-joined Parliament only last week after spending most of the past 10 years in political deep-freeze, is confident he can meet the deadline.

"That he does have past experience in managing the country and the economy is a definite boost," said Vishnu Varathan, an economist at Forecast Singapore Pte Ltd.

"But at the end of the day, investors weigh country and political risks. So first of all, Anwar has to show his party has enough support in Parliament. That it can stand strong in Parliament, that there is no factional infighting. Investors would certainly be anxious to see if the new team can produce coherent policies to govern the country and manage the economy," Vishnu added.

Ending the stalemate

Anwar’s Pakatan coalition currently holds 82 out of 222 parliamentary seats and they are banking on defections from the Barisan to reverse the majority. A Pakatan leader has said the alliance could now count on more than 40 Barisan members of parliament to change camp. That's 10 more than the minimum 30 needed to take control of the government. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has however rubbished the claims.

Barring external shocks, analysts expect quiet trading, with the KLSE Composite Index wavering between plus/minus 5 points for most days as investors keep to the sidelines ahead of what could be the most dramatic sea change the country has ever witnessed.

“There is a possibility the stock market may drop for several days due to volatility initially, but this should eventually stabilise as the players adapt to the new environment,” Yeoh said.

“Many have complained that the economy has slowed significantly anyway and that any uncertainty should be done with at present, doubts cleared, and should change take place let it take place - and the market will respond naturally. The main question about whether this trend will exacerbate or not is dependent on the responses taken by the existing administration to that sudden change,” she added.

Like the man-in-the-street, investors here have never known any government other than that led by the Barisan, which is controlled by Abdullah's Umno party. While Abdullah is known for his simplicity and softness, his predecessor Dr Mahathir Mohamad ruled with a fist of iron for 22 years. Despite their contrasting styles, both leaders relied heavily on pro-business policies and big government to pump-prime economic growth.

But while the resource-rich economy has thrived, coming in second only to Singapore in the region in terms of infrastructure development and economic wealth, analysts have long warned of a day of reckoning. For years, they pointed to rising bottle-necks in the form of rampant corruption and mounting socio-economic inefficiencies wrought by cronyism and racial favourtism.

“The economic slowdown during Abdullah's tenure can be attributed to continued wastage of federal money through endemic corruption, the inability to respond quickly to market trends and the global downturn, which is unavoidable. Further, it continued to embark on several mega projects such as the numerous economic corridors,” Yeoh said.

Policy flip-flops made by both Abdullah and Mahathir are another sore point with investors, who especially remember the huge losses triggered when Mahathir suddenly banned overseas trading in Malaysian shares and the ringgit in a bid to stem capital flight during the Asian financial crisis.

"Investors like to see a more democratic Malaysia that is more stable and strong in the medium to long term. After 51 years of independence, it would be debilitating to follow the old ways that have slowed down growth and income distribution goals," said prominent economist Ramon Navaratnam.

May soften before rebounding

MIA's Dr Lim reckons that Malaysians have 'come of age' and as long as any change in government was peacefully carried out, investors would cheer the 'transformation'.

"Most Malaysian investors believe a change is better because honestly, when a government has been around so long, it becomes stale," Lim said. "It's just like Obama in the US. He is advocating fresh ideas and fresh policies. The caveat here is - the process must be peaceful."

“If, however, there are severe reactions to this change in government, resulting in physical violence, mass demonstrations from the current regime, or at worst the rule of emergency, then without a doubt the country's economy will suffer from investment flight out,” Yeoh said.

Malaysian shares have lost about 25 percent in market value since the start of this year, hit by weak global markets, sky-high oil prices and domestic political uncertainty. At the close of trade on Friday, the KLSE Composite Index stood at 1,070.54 points, down 1.34 percent for the day. Some chartists have pegged strong support at the 900 points level.

The ringgit, at 3.284 against the US dollar on Jan 1, has also lost ground amid fears runaway inflation could further erode its value after the central bank resisted raising interest rates to counter record fuel and commodity prices. At 5 pm on Friday, the ringgit was trading at about 3.459 to the dollar, down by about 5.3 percent on the year.

Whether or not Anwar succeeds within his stated time-line, Lim warned against any euphoric reaction from stock investors, saying sharp gains may be temporary, given the increasing challenges in the global economy. Ultimately, Anwar would have to find ways to counter these and deliver, just like any other leader, he said.

Lim, who agreed with Yeoh that Malaysian markets might get worse before they could get better, also said it was premature to pick winners and losers.

"It's definitely easier to spot the losers at this point in time. Obviously, these will be firms that have close links to the current government - some oil-related and construction firms. For the winners, we have to wait and see what sort of economic direction Anwar plots if he does take over the government," Lim said.

Unhappy with Abdullah’s budget

To counter Abdullah’s budget for 2009 presented last week, the 61-year old Anwar has promised to unveil a brand new and even better budget once he comes into power. Among improvements that Anwar has assured are a faster pace of economic liberalisation, stronger role for the private sector, extensive investment in education and lower fuel prices.

“These are still promises on paper and the burden lies on his administration should they take over, to deliver on these promises. I would caution however that downward adjustment of fuel prices is not sustainable in the long run and some measured estimates are necessary if global oil price rises,” Yeoh said.

Abdullah had announced a RM207.9 billion budget for 2009, the country's biggest spending plan ever, aimed at returning spending power to the people. It included a one-month bonus for all civil servants, income tax cuts and a slew of reductions in import duties and sales tax for food and agro-based products.

While analysts praised Abdullah’s efforts to help the poor and lower middle-income groups, they also see the plan as an inflationary spending spree, lacking in concrete drivers to stimulate private sector investment and demand.

“Longer-term solutions are necessary and we hope this is visible through Anwar should he take over - but this is premised on the assumption that key deliverables are accompanied by political will, and that we will see some quick results in the short term. The economy is stale presently. A major boost is required, that will mark significant reform in operational and distributional implementation,” Yeoh said.

Analysts also pointed to the widening budget deficit which is set to hit 4.8 percent of GDP by the end of this year, compared with 3.2 percent last year. They were also unhappy with the government’s ballooning operating expenditure, which has risen sharply since Abdullah took office in 2004, nearly doubling from RM80.5 billion then to RM154.2 billion in 2009.

"Whether the government has enough money, nobody really knows because there is a lack of transparency," said political and economics analyst Khoo Kay Peng.

"We have one of the biggest bureaucracies in the region, we are too labour-centric and this is why we have the image of not being efficient. Yes, in the past the public administration is used as a political tool, a vote bank. But we must take politics out of the equation. Anyway, it hasn't helped them (Abdullah and his Umno party) in the elections anymore," Khoo said.

何日见曙光?

Posted: 06-09-08 Sat 3:24 pm
by 杨淑慧
很怀疑今年国庆主题"团结为成功基石"的定义到底何在?出现了这一番言论,叫非华裔太沉重.多元种族的国家,团结最重要.龙头老大政党出现了一位种族主义者,各族团结何日可见曙光?

Re: 何日见曙光?

Posted: 06-09-08 Sat 3:41 pm
by xiao yew
杨淑慧 wrote:很怀疑今年国庆主题"团结为成功基石"的定义到底何在?出现了这一番言论,叫非华裔太沉重.多元种族的国家,团结最重要.龙头老大政党出现了一位种族主义者,各族团结何日可见曙光?

今年的国庆主题,看来还是改一改吧!
今天报章上所说的BTN课程才是这主题的反义,
上了之后,反倒觉得大马几时才会摆脱种族的争议呢?
这些种族主义是个人的言论或思想所造成的。
我还是觉得最重要的还是看回国家的宪法吧!
里面清楚列明了我们华人的地位,
得请阿末回家去读一读书!

Posted: 06-09-08 Sat 4:00 pm
by xiao yew
转载:http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/80790?tid=40
阿末否認說過寄居論‧提醒巫統勿為他族感受傷害馬來人

(檳城)巫統升旗山區部主席拿督阿末依斯邁今日(週五,9月5日)說,他從來沒有講過華人是寄居者,並提醒黨最高領導層不要在此課題上為了顧及他族的感受反而傷害了馬來人,這樣恐怕會失去更多馬來人的支持。

他說,8月23日他在峇東埔選區的甘榜比樂發表的言論,只是提到華人獨立前是寄居者,因為華人是被英國引進這片馬來土地,獨立後達致社會契約才會出現今天這種情況。

“由於我不曾講過華人是寄居者的言論,我要求撰寫這則新聞的記者向我、我的家人和全馬的馬來人及回教徒道歉,因為我懷疑這位記者有本身的議程。”

他聲稱,根據他所瞭解,有關記者不是專跑政治新聞的記者,他絕對不會因為報章所犯下的錯誤而道歉。

阿末依斯邁下午聯合檳州巫統各區部的代表在新聞發佈會上形容,他在過去一個星期來受到“媒體法庭”審訊,對他是非常不公平的。

他也要求曾經批評他的華人領袖,包括國陣成員黨領袖,尤其是民政黨全國代主席丹斯里許子根向他道歉。

“這些領袖在沒有查清事實前就發出毫無根據的批評,對他非常不公平。”

他也聲稱,他當晚是說非馬來人在獨立前是外來者已經是不能否認的事實,所以強調只是根據歷史的記載,以及巫統捍衛馬來人和回教徒的政治權益,來向甘榜比樂的馬來選民解釋國家爭取獨立的過程。

他非常感謝檳州巫統另外12個區部力挺他,讓他不會覺得自己在孤軍作戰,並重申自己不是極端種族主義份子。

他說,雖然批評他的人士把他標榜成極端種族主義份子,但卻有很多馬來人把他視為愛國主義者,並作為他的後盾。

他覺得整個事件中的報導對他不公平也不專業,也覺得自己受到“媒體公審”,他並沒有虧欠任何人。

星洲日報‧2008.09.05

Re: 何日见曙光?

Posted: 06-09-08 Sat 7:19 pm
by 大风
杨淑慧 wrote:很怀疑今年国庆主题"团结为成功基石"的定义到底何在?出现了这一番言论,叫非华裔太沉重.多元种族的国家,团结最重要.龙头老大政党出现了一位种族主义者,各族团结何日可见曙光?
岂止一位?